Posts Tagged ‘Michael Chertoff’

What do you think of this idea?

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009
landscape contractor
deport_scum asked:


Volunteers keep eye on border using their Web cams
Sean Holstege
The Arizona Republic
Apr. 4, 2008 12:00 AM

It’s not just the government doing high-tech surveillance of the border anymore. And it doesn’t take a huge defense contractor and a satellite, either.

Two volunteer groups, one a splinter from the well-known Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, have cameras in Cochise County pointed at the Mexican border up to 200 yards away and at busy smuggling routes.

Anyone with a fast-enough Internet connection can sign up to work the cameras remotely, although one of the groups first submits volunteers to a background check. The volunteers report any sightings of smugglers or immigrants to the Border Patrol. advertisement

The small-scale operations may seem quaint, but the border groups maintain that their cameras, which transmit wirelessly to the Web, have led to the arrest of hundreds of border crossers in recent months.

The efforts highlight how, in the groups’ view, a fairly simple system can work as well as the government’s approach, which is a sophisticated, high-tech satellite-surveillance operation called Project 28.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s “virtual fence” experiment was delayed eight months by glitches, and questions linger about how well the $20 million system works. Sen. John McCain called the project “a disgrace”; another Republican congressman introduced a bill to scrap the experiment.

“We are building a model that already works better than Project 28,” said Jon Healy, founder of the TechnoPatriots, a commercial venture and offshoot of the Minuteman group.

Federal officials said they haven’t seen the volunteer cameras and couldn’t comment.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff insists that Project 28 near Sasabe is effective, although contractors are refining how the 28-mile pilot system of cameras and sensors beams data to Border Patrol agents via satellite.

“I think this Project 28 will be good once we get to tweak it,” Border Patrol spokesman Ramon Rivera said. “We want to see who’s crossing the border, what they’re carrying and if they have a mole on their face.”

Armchair volunteers

The non-profit American Border Patrol, based in Sierra Vista, launched remote-controlled cameras on the border in 2005, allowing armchair volunteers to log in and view the border from the safety of their homes. Volunteers are given a background check before being allowed to work the cameras.

Since November, the non-profit TechnoPatriots, based in Palominas, has operated a long-range camera that can be remotely panned, tilted and zoomed, plus a thermal camera that monitors the border by night. Volunteers must pay $10 when they sign up on the Web site. Healy said he plans to get more cameras, sound monitors, ground sensors and software that weaves it all together.

His group says its volunteers have reported 160 sightings to the Border Patrol, resulting in 116 arrests.

The Border Patrol could not confirm the number because it does not track whether callers belong to such groups. But agents said they are grateful for any help from the public.

TechnoPatriots invites volunteers to sign up for 30-minute shifts to watch the Web, manipulate the cameras and report illegal border crossings. The volunteer groups say they can do the job more cheaply than Project 28 because their systems use high-speed wireless Internet, not satellites.

“If I had the money Boeing had, there would not be one single person walking through there undetected,” said Mike Christie, operations director for American Border Patrol.

By day, the cameras show the windswept beige grass and brush landscape of Cochise County, punctuated occasionally by movements of people on smuggling trails. By night, volunteers watch a dark, murky image for the ghostly shape of humans emitting body heat.

On a limited scale, the groups’ efforts parallel those of the Border Patrol. For years, Border Patrol dispatchers have forwarded information from agents’ observations, static cameras and sensors to roving agents via radio. The government’s Secure Border Initiative, including Project 28, will add a network of cameras and sensors to help agents better know the situation in advance.

Boeing contract

The virtual fence is a string of towers that beam signals via satellite into the trucks of agents and the command center. The idea is for agents and supervisors to have common, precise information and to move cameras remotely to get a better read on border crossers.

The problem is agents still find themselves in dead spots, and for months, government contractor Boeing Corp. had to work out the kinks in the relays.

After accepting Boeing’s work, Homeland Security agreed to pay the $20 million contract even though government auditors and Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar testified to Congress that Project 28 didn’t meet the 95 percent detection standards. Homeland Security officials overseeing the project said the next phase will be pushed back three years as Boeing refines the technology.

Still, officials insist the system is effective. Project 28 has resulted in 2,400 arrests in its first month of operation, agency spokeswoman Laura Keehner said. Border Patrol agents say it already gives them improved capability. Rivera said the technology can distinguish people from animals, count them and give agents a good idea if they are armed. The trick now is to get that information piped directly to their patrol trucks.

Homeland Security went to Boeing looking to cover communication dead spots via satellite. Rivera acknowledges that wireless would work well but would also mean persuading property owners to allow easements to build and maintain cell towers.

Based on the prices and ranges of equipment bought by volunteer groups, if cameras and cell towers were installed to cover the entire 1,950-mile border, it would cost roughly $40 million to $250 million. The government’s technology plan for the border is estimated at $1.2 billion.
I think i will join them

landscape design

What do you think of THIS?

Friday, May 15th, 2009
landscape contractor
sealRborders asked:


Print view

Billions at stake in border contract
By Dave Montgomery

McClatchy Newspapers

PREV 1 of 3 NEXT

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff sees a mix of technology and manpower.

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is expected next month to choose an industry consortium to erect a high-tech security shield along the U.S. borders, launching one of the federal government’s most ambitious public-works projects in years.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) calls the proposed Secure Border Initiative Net (SBInet) the “most comprehensive effort in the nation’s history” to gain control of more than 6,000 miles of border with Mexico and Canada, and 2,000 miles of coastline.

SBInet is a centerpiece of President Bush’s efforts to fortify the U.S.-Mexico border at a time Congress is locked in a struggle to revise the nation’s immigration laws. Administration officials say they intend to proceed with the security net regardless of the outcome of the debate over immigration legislation.

The multibillion-dollar undertaking has ignited a contract battle among industry teams headed by four leading defense companies — Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon — and Ericsson, the Swedish-based telecommunications giant with U.S. headquarters in Plano, Texas.

Competitors diverse

Collectively, the teams are composed of nearly 40 companies in more than 15 states, a diverse lineup that includes global engineering firms, niche industries adept at biometric identification or surveillance, and aerospace corporations better known for churning out warplanes, tanks and missiles.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a branch of the DHS, is expected to announce a winner by Sept. 30.

As envisioned by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, SBInet would marry industry expertise with the 42,000-employee Customs and Border Protection to create a wall of technology, manpower and infrastructure in the next six years. The initial cost is projected at $2.5 billion, but the price could be much higher.

The shield is a dominant component of the Secure Border Initiative that Chertoff announced in November to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. More than 1.2 million illegal immigrants were arrested in 2005, nearly all on the southern border.

Although Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Michael Jackson told industry officials the project is “not about simply buying gizmos,” much of the attention has focused on the potential mix of technology. Most of the proposals include state-of-the-art sensors, mounted cameras, unmanned aerial vehicles, radar and other surveillance hardware.

Calls for toughening the border have intensified with the approach of the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the recent alleged terrorist bomb plot in Britain. But the project has come under heightened scrutiny on Capitol Hill after a congressional report last month blasted DHS procurement polices.

The bipartisan report, released by the House Committee on Government Reform, identified $34.3 billion worth of DHS contracts marred by significant overcharges, wasteful spending or mismanagement. The troubled projects include a largely ineffective camera-surveillance system along the Mexican and Canadian borders.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., complained that SBInet could be exposed to the same problems, contending the DHS is giving industry too much latitude in determining how the system should be tailored. “That’s not governing,” he said. “It’s utter incompetence, and it’s going to cost the taxpayers billions.”

From the bidders’ vantage point, SBInet could create thousands of jobs and illustrate the defense industry’s expanding transition into homeland security. Tools of war — such as radar and satellite surveillance — easily can be redirected into the campaign to guard the home front, industry officials say.

“We see it as an increasing market,” said John Douglass, president and chief executive officer of the Aerospace Industries Association. “Many of the technologies that make you a successful aerospace contractor would also make you a successful homeland-security contractor.”

Several of the team members started preparing for the project more than two years ago, when the DHS was considering a since-abandoned border initiative called America’s Shield. Team representatives spent months on the border, and several bidders set up remote border-area test sites to evaluate equipment.

Nearly 60 potential bidders expressed interest in the project before the DHS winnowed the field to the five rival teams. Universities in Texas, New Mexico and Arizona are aligned with several of the teams, reflecting academia’s growing expertise in homeland security and border demographics.

Bidders made oral presentations in the past two weeks and have until Monday to update their proposals.

While SBInet bristles with opportunity, the winning team will face immense obstacles in trying to create a leakproof “virtual wall” traversing rugged desert terrain in the south and mountainous, wooded landscape in the north. The challenges probably will include property-rights disputes and environmental issues.

Sensors and cameras have been operating along the borders for years; the SBInet team will be charged with building a system tying all the pieces together. In addition to technology, the industry team will provide contract personnel for non-law-enforcement jobs and train government agents to adapt to the new system.

Sensors popular item

In January, Jackson urged industry officials to be innovative without straying “onto the wacky edge of creativity.” Most proposals call for a network of thousands of sensors that would detect movement, sound and, in some cases, odor.

The sensor then would flash an alarm on a computerized map in a command-and-control center, where an operator would train a long-range mounted camera on the site to determine whether an animal or a human intruder tripped the alarm.

If necessary, agents would be dispatched. Several, if not all, of the teams would augment the protection with unmanned surveillance aircraft and, in some cases, high-altitude surveillance balloons
‘alberto” this is a REALITY that IS going to happen!!!! Get USED TO IT!!!!!! DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS>>>>>>>>>>
SUPPORT HR 4437!!!!!!!!!
Hasta la bye bye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

landscape contractor

What do you think of this idea?

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009
landscape contractors
deport_scum asked:


Volunteers keep eye on border using their Web cams
Sean Holstege
The Arizona Republic
Apr. 4, 2008 12:00 AM

It’s not just the government doing high-tech surveillance of the border anymore. And it doesn’t take a huge defense contractor and a satellite, either.

Two volunteer groups, one a splinter from the well-known Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, have cameras in Cochise County pointed at the Mexican border up to 200 yards away and at busy smuggling routes.

Anyone with a fast-enough Internet connection can sign up to work the cameras remotely, although one of the groups first submits volunteers to a background check. The volunteers report any sightings of smugglers or immigrants to the Border Patrol. advertisement

The small-scale operations may seem quaint, but the border groups maintain that their cameras, which transmit wirelessly to the Web, have led to the arrest of hundreds of border crossers in recent months.

The efforts highlight how, in the groups’ view, a fairly simple system can work as well as the government’s approach, which is a sophisticated, high-tech satellite-surveillance operation called Project 28.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s “virtual fence” experiment was delayed eight months by glitches, and questions linger about how well the $20 million system works. Sen. John McCain called the project “a disgrace”; another Republican congressman introduced a bill to scrap the experiment.

“We are building a model that already works better than Project 28,” said Jon Healy, founder of the TechnoPatriots, a commercial venture and offshoot of the Minuteman group.

Federal officials said they haven’t seen the volunteer cameras and couldn’t comment.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff insists that Project 28 near Sasabe is effective, although contractors are refining how the 28-mile pilot system of cameras and sensors beams data to Border Patrol agents via satellite.

“I think this Project 28 will be good once we get to tweak it,” Border Patrol spokesman Ramon Rivera said. “We want to see who’s crossing the border, what they’re carrying and if they have a mole on their face.”

Armchair volunteers

The non-profit American Border Patrol, based in Sierra Vista, launched remote-controlled cameras on the border in 2005, allowing armchair volunteers to log in and view the border from the safety of their homes. Volunteers are given a background check before being allowed to work the cameras.

Since November, the non-profit TechnoPatriots, based in Palominas, has operated a long-range camera that can be remotely panned, tilted and zoomed, plus a thermal camera that monitors the border by night. Volunteers must pay $10 when they sign up on the Web site. Healy said he plans to get more cameras, sound monitors, ground sensors and software that weaves it all together.

His group says its volunteers have reported 160 sightings to the Border Patrol, resulting in 116 arrests.

The Border Patrol could not confirm the number because it does not track whether callers belong to such groups. But agents said they are grateful for any help from the public.

TechnoPatriots invites volunteers to sign up for 30-minute shifts to watch the Web, manipulate the cameras and report illegal border crossings. The volunteer groups say they can do the job more cheaply than Project 28 because their systems use high-speed wireless Internet, not satellites.

“If I had the money Boeing had, there would not be one single person walking through there undetected,” said Mike Christie, operations director for American Border Patrol.

By day, the cameras show the windswept beige grass and brush landscape of Cochise County, punctuated occasionally by movements of people on smuggling trails. By night, volunteers watch a dark, murky image for the ghostly shape of humans emitting body heat.

On a limited scale, the groups’ efforts parallel those of the Border Patrol. For years, Border Patrol dispatchers have forwarded information from agents’ observations, static cameras and sensors to roving agents via radio. The government’s Secure Border Initiative, including Project 28, will add a network of cameras and sensors to help agents better know the situation in advance.

Boeing contract

The virtual fence is a string of towers that beam signals via satellite into the trucks of agents and the command center. The idea is for agents and supervisors to have common, precise information and to move cameras remotely to get a better read on border crossers.

The problem is agents still find themselves in dead spots, and for months, government contractor Boeing Corp. had to work out the kinks in the relays.

After accepting Boeing’s work, Homeland Security agreed to pay the $20 million contract even though government auditors and Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar testified to Congress that Project 28 didn’t meet the 95 percent detection standards. Homeland Security officials overseeing the project said the next phase will be pushed back three years as Boeing refines the technology.

Still, officials insist the system is effective. Project 28 has resulted in 2,400 arrests in its first month of operation, agency spokeswoman Laura Keehner said. Border Patrol agents say it already gives them improved capability. Rivera said the technology can distinguish people from animals, count them and give agents a good idea if they are armed. The trick now is to get that information piped directly to their patrol trucks.

Homeland Security went to Boeing looking to cover communication dead spots via satellite. Rivera acknowledges that wireless would work well but would also mean persuading property owners to allow easements to build and maintain cell towers.

Based on the prices and ranges of equipment bought by volunteer groups, if cameras and cell towers were installed to cover the entire 1,950-mile border, it would cost roughly $40 million to $250 million. The government’s technology plan for the border is estimated at $1.2 billion.
I think i will join them

landscape contractors Minnesota